Sample report

What a MyTherapistFit report looks like

This is a real example based on a 34-year-old client comparing two therapists after free consults. Your report is built from your own assessment and consultation notes.

Therapist A — Dr. Marin

Best match
Trauma Competence92/100
Attachment Awareness88/100
Communication Fit76/100
Goal Alignment84/100
Practical Fit70/100
Overall Compatibility86/100

Therapist B — Dr. Lowell

Strong on logistics
Trauma Competence71/100
Attachment Awareness65/100
Communication Fit82/100
Goal Alignment60/100
Practical Fit90/100
Overall Compatibility70/100

Green flags (Therapist A)

  • Specifically trained in EMDR and IFS — directly aligned with your goals
  • Asked about your nervous system and pacing, not just symptoms
  • Comfortable with attachment ruptures and repair in the therapeutic relationship

Yellow flags

  • Waitlist of 2–3 weeks before first real session
  • Higher self-pay rate; only out-of-network with your insurance
  • Office is 25 minutes away; virtual is available but not their preference

Red flags (Therapist B)

  • Vague when asked how they work with trauma — defaulted to 'we'll see'
  • Talked over you twice when you described past therapy experiences
  • Framed boundary-setting as 'resistance' — concerning for attachment work

AI recommendation

Therapist A is the stronger fit for your goals.

Therapist A scores higher on trauma competence, attachment awareness, and goal alignment — the dimensions that matter most for the work you described. Therapist B is more convenient and in-network, but the consultation surfaced concerns about how they hold space for trauma and boundaries. If logistics are a blocker, ask Therapist A about a sliding scale or biweekly cadence before ruling them out.

This is an alignment summary, not clinical advice. You make the final call.

Sample compatibility report

The compatibility markers you’ll see

After the client and therapist assessments, you get a relational-fit report scored across emotional safety, communication, attachment, and growth style.

Compatibility report

Dr. Marin

Overall Fit & Compatibility Score
84/100
Combines both the client & therapist assessments
Strong evidence6 of 8 dimensions overlap directly (75%) between the client’s profile and the therapist’s.

A strong relational fit — Dr. Marin’s pacing, attachment style, and growth approach line up closely with what you said you need.

Emotional Safety88/100
Communication Compatibility82/100
Attachment Compatibility79/100
Growth Style Compatibility85/100

Strengths of this pairing

  • Both value slow, attuned pacing over agenda-driven sessions
  • Therapist’s direct-but-warm style matches how you process
  • Shared comfort naming ruptures in the therapeutic relationship

Potential friction points

  • You prefer some between-session structure; therapist leans process-only
  • Therapist’s use of silence may feel heavy early on
  • Check whether somatic work fits your comfort with body-based cues

Discussion topics for your first session

  • How we’ll handle moments when I shut down
    You named withdrawal as your stress response; aligning on repair early prevents stalled sessions.
  • Cadence and between-session touchpoints
    You like light structure; the therapist defaults to none. Worth agreeing on a middle ground.
  • Working with somatic / body-based cues
    Therapist uses it often. Confirm it matches your comfort before it shows up mid-session.

Ready for your own report?

Take the 5-minute assessment and get your personalized consultation guide and fit report.